Accounting Standards ASC 815 Overview
Accounting Standards ASC 815 Overview
ASC 815 (Derivatives and Hedging) establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and hedging activities. All derivatives must be recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, with changes in fair value generally recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met.
Definition and Key Concepts
Derivative Definition
Under ASC 815, a derivative has these characteristics:
| Characteristic | Description |
|---|---|
| Underlying | Value changes based on reference rate, price, index |
| Notional amount | Specified quantity (units, shares, dollars) |
| No initial net investment | Or smaller than for similar instruments |
| Net settlement | Can be settled net in cash or equivalent |
Derivative Classification
| Category | Balance Sheet | Earnings Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Trading | Fair value, current asset/liability | Changes in earnings |
| Hedging (fair value) | Fair value | Offset hedged item |
| Hedging (cash flow) | Fair value | Through OCI to earnings |
| Hedging (net investment) | Fair value | Through CTA |
Hedge Types
| Hedge Type | Purpose | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Fair value hedge | Offset exposure to changes in FV | Fixed-rate debt hedged with IRS |
| Cash flow hedge | Offset exposure to variable cash flows | Forecasted purchase hedged with forward |
| Net investment hedge | Offset FX exposure in foreign sub | Forward contract on subsidiary currency |
How It Works in Practice
Fair Value Measurement
All derivatives at fair value:
| Level | Input Type | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Level 1 | Quoted prices, active markets | Exchange-traded options |
| Level 2 | Observable inputs | Interest rate swaps (curve-based) |
| Level 3 | Unobservable inputs | Complex structured products |
Fair value hierarchy considerations:
| Factor | Impact on Level |
|---|---|
| Market liquidity | Higher liquidity → Level 1/2 |
| Model complexity | More complex → Level 3 |
| Input observability | Less observable → Level 3 |
| Credit adjustment | CVA/DVA may push to Level 3 |
Hedge Accounting Requirements
Documentation requirements (at inception):
| Requirement | Description |
|---|---|
| Hedging relationship | Identify hedged item and hedging instrument |
| Risk being hedged | Specify the risk (interest rate, FX, commodity) |
| Effectiveness method | How effectiveness will be assessed |
| Hedge objective | Risk management objective and strategy |
| Excluded components | Time value, forward points, etc. |
Effectiveness assessment:
| Method | Description | Application |
|---|---|---|
| Dollar-offset | Compare changes in FV | Fair value hedges |
| Regression | Statistical relationship | Complex hedges |
| Critical terms match | Terms substantially identical | Simplified approach |
| Shortcut method | Perfect offset assumed | IRS hedging fixed debt |
Journal Entries
Fair value hedge (simplified):
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Derivative asset | $100,000 | |
| Hedged item (debt adjustment) | $100,000 | |
| Hedged item (debt adjustment) | $95,000 | |
| Derivative asset | $95,000 | |
| P&L (ineffectiveness) | $5,000 |
Cash flow hedge (simplified):
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Derivative asset | $100,000 | |
| OCI | $100,000 | |
| OCI (reclassification) | $100,000 | |
| Revenue/Expense | $100,000 |
Worked Example
Interest Rate Swap Hedge Accounting
Scenario: Company issues $50M fixed-rate debt at 5.00% for 5 years and enters into pay-fixed, receive-floating swap to convert to floating rate.
Hedge documentation:
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Hedged item | $50M fixed-rate debt, 5.00%, 5-year |
| Hedging instrument | $50M pay-fixed 5.00%, receive SOFR IRS |
| Risk hedged | Changes in fair value due to interest rates |
| Effectiveness method | Shortcut method (terms match) |
| Hedge designation | Fair value hedge |
Initial recognition:
| Date | Event | Journal Entry |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1, 2025 | Issue debt | Dr. Cash $50M, Cr. Debt $50M |
| Jan 1, 2025 | Enter swap | No entry (fair value = 0) |
Subsequent measurement (rates decline):
| Date | Swap FV | Debt FV Change |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 31, 2025 | ($1,200,000) | $1,200,000 |
| Jun 30, 2025 | ($800,000) | $800,000 |
Q1 journal entries:
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Loss on derivative | $1,200,000 | |
| Derivative liability | $1,200,000 | |
| Debt (FV adjustment) | $1,200,000 | |
| Gain on hedged item | $1,200,000 |
Net P&L impact: $0 (fully offset under shortcut method)
Balance sheet presentation:
| Line Item | Amount |
|---|---|
| Debt (carrying value) | $51,200,000 |
| Derivative liability | ($1,200,000) |
| Net debt exposure | $50,000,000 |
Cash Flow Hedge Example
Scenario: Company forecasts purchasing EUR 10M of inventory in 6 months and enters forward to hedge FX risk.
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Hedged item | Forecasted EUR 10M purchase |
| Hedging instrument | Forward to buy EUR 10M at 1.10 |
| Risk hedged | Variability in USD cash flows |
| Effectiveness method | Critical terms match |
| Hedge designation | Cash flow hedge |
Forward value changes:
| Date | Forward FV | OCI Entry |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 31 | $150,000 | $150,000 credit |
| Jun 30 | $200,000 | $50,000 credit |
At purchase (EUR strengthened):
| Account | Debit | Credit |
|---|---|---|
| Inventory | $11,000,000 | |
| Cash | $11,000,000 | |
| OCI | $200,000 | |
| Inventory | $200,000 |
Net inventory cost: $10,800,000 (effective rate: 1.08)
Risks, Limitations, and Tradeoffs
Hedge Accounting Risks
| Risk | Description | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| De-designation | Hedge no longer qualifies | Earnings volatility |
| Ineffectiveness | Imperfect offset | P&L impact |
| Documentation failure | Incomplete at inception | Cannot apply hedge accounting |
| Forecasted transaction | Does not occur | OCI reclassified to earnings |
Common Pitfalls
| Pitfall | Description | Prevention |
|---|---|---|
| Late documentation | Hedge docs after trade | Concurrent documentation |
| Terms mismatch | Hedge and item don't match | Careful structuring |
| Over-hedging | Notional exceeds exposure | Match to forecasted amount |
| Probability assessment | Forecasted transaction uncertain | Document probability |
| Shortcut method abuse | Apply when terms don't match | Verify all criteria |
Disclosure Requirements
| Disclosure | Content |
|---|---|
| Objectives | Risk management strategy |
| Instruments | Types of derivatives used |
| Fair value | Carrying amounts by type |
| Gains/losses | By hedge type and ineffective portion |
| Credit risk | Maximum exposure, collateral |
| Concentrations | Significant counterparties |
Recent Standards Updates
ASU 2017-12 Improvements
| Change | Impact |
|---|---|
| Effectiveness threshold | Eliminated 80-125% requirement |
| Excluded components | Can recognize in OCI |
| Partial-term hedges | Allowed for fair value hedges |
| Last-of-layer method | Prepayable instruments |
ASU 2020-04 Reference Rate Reform
| Provision | Description |
|---|---|
| Contract modifications | Relief from derecognition |
| Hedge accounting | Expedients for IBOR transition |
| Held-to-maturity | No tainting from modifications |
Checklist and Next Steps
Hedge documentation checklist:
- Identify hedged item precisely
- Identify hedging instrument
- Specify risk being hedged
- Document effectiveness method
- State risk management objective
- Address excluded components
- Complete at or before designation
Ongoing monitoring checklist:
- Assess effectiveness each period
- Calculate and record ineffectiveness
- Verify hedge still qualifies
- Update forecasted transaction probability
- Document any de-designations
- Prepare required disclosures
Financial statement checklist:
- Classify derivatives correctly
- Measure at fair value
- Record hedge adjustments
- Track OCI for cash flow hedges
- Disclose per ASC 815 requirements
- Reconcile to risk management reports
Internal control checklist:
- Segregate front and back office
- Independent valuation
- Reconcile to counterparty
- Review hedge effectiveness
- Approve hedge designations
- Archive documentation
Related articles:
- For model controls, see Model Governance and Controls Requirements
- For operational risk, see Operational Risk in High-Volume Options Trading