ISDA Master Agreement Overview

intermediatePublished: 2026-01-01

ISDA Master Agreement Overview

The ISDA Master Agreement is the foundational legal document for over-the-counter derivatives transactions. Published by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, it standardizes terms across counterparties, reducing legal costs and enabling efficient trading. Understanding its structure is essential for anyone involved in OTC derivatives.

Definition and Key Concepts

Document Hierarchy

The ISDA framework consists of three interconnected documents:

DocumentPurpose
Master AgreementStandard terms governing the relationship
ScheduleCustomizations to the Master Agreement
ConfirmationTrade-specific terms for each transaction

Principle: The Master Agreement and Schedule are negotiated once. Each trade then requires only a Confirmation referencing the master terms.

Version History

VersionYearKey Features
1987 ISDA1987First standardized master
1992 ISDA1992Added Market Quotation/Loss methods
2002 ISDA2002Streamlined close-out; single agreement concept

The 2002 ISDA Master is the current standard for new relationships.

Core Provisions

SectionContent
Section 1Interpretation
Section 2Obligations (payments and deliveries)
Section 3Representations
Section 4Agreements (ongoing covenants)
Section 5Events of Default and Termination Events
Section 6Early Termination
Section 7Transfer (assignment rules)
Section 8Contractual Currency
Section 9Miscellaneous
Section 10Offices; Multibranch Parties
Section 11Expenses
Section 12Notices
Section 13Governing Law and Jurisdiction
Section 14Definitions

How It Works in Practice

Schedule Customization

The Schedule modifies the Master Agreement for the specific relationship:

Common Schedule elections:

ItemStandard Options
Governing lawEnglish or New York
Termination CurrencyUSD, EUR, or other
Cross-default thresholdAmount (e.g., $25 million)
Additional Termination EventsFund NAV decline, ratings downgrade
NettingMultiple Transaction Payment Netting

Key Schedule Provisions

Part 1: Termination Provisions

  • Specify which Events of Default apply
  • Set thresholds for cross-default
  • Define Additional Termination Events

Part 2: Tax Representations

  • Payer representations
  • Payee representations
  • FATCA compliance

Part 3: Agreement to Deliver Documents

  • Legal opinions
  • Board resolutions
  • Annual financial statements

Part 4: Miscellaneous

  • Address for notices
  • Process agent appointments
  • Calculation Agent designation

Part 5: Other Provisions

  • Relationship between parties
  • Recording of conversations
  • Confidentiality

Confirmation Structure

Each trade has a Confirmation specifying:

ElementExample
Trade date2025-01-15
Effective date2025-01-17
Termination date2030-01-17
Notional amount$100,000,000
Fixed rate4.25%
Floating rateSOFR
Payment frequencyQuarterly
Day countActual/360
Business daysNew York

Confirmations reference ISDA Definitions (e.g., 2021 ISDA Interest Rate Derivatives Definitions) for standard terms.

Worked Example

Scenario: Investment bank (Party A) and hedge fund (Party B) establish ISDA relationship.

Schedule elections:

ElectionChoice
Governing lawNew York
Threshold (Party A)Infinity (no cross-default)
Threshold (Party B)$10,000,000
Additional Termination EventParty B NAV declines >30%
Credit Support AnnexNY Law CSA with daily margining

Trade example: 5-year interest rate swap, $50 million notional

Confirmation terms:

  • Party A pays: Fixed 4.50%
  • Party B pays: SOFR + 0 bps
  • Payment dates: IMM dates (Mar/Jun/Sep/Dec 20)
  • Calculation Agent: Party A

Payment calculation (first quarter, 91 days):

Party A fixed payment: = $50,000,000 × 4.50% × (91/360) = $568,750

Party B floating payment (SOFR average = 4.25%): = $50,000,000 × 4.25% × (91/360) = $537,153

Net: Party A pays Party B $31,597

Risks, Limitations, and Tradeoffs

Events of Default

Standard Events of Default include:

EventDescription
Failure to PayMissed payment after grace period (typically 3 business days)
Breach of AgreementViolation of Schedule covenants
Credit Support DefaultFailure to post or return collateral
MisrepresentationMaterial misstatement proven false
Default Under Specified TransactionCross-default to other derivatives
Cross-DefaultDefault on other debt above threshold
BankruptcyInsolvency or bankruptcy filing
Merger Without AssumptionSuccessor fails to assume obligations

Early Termination Mechanics

Upon Event of Default or Termination Event:

  1. Designation: Non-defaulting party designates Early Termination Date
  2. Calculation: Close-out amount determined for all transactions
  3. Netting: Single net amount owed between parties
  4. Payment: Net amount due within specified period

Close-out methodology (2002 ISDA): Close-out Amount based on actual or hypothetical replacement cost, including bid-offer costs and other losses.

Single Agreement Concept

All transactions under an ISDA are treated as a single agreement:

BenefitDescription
NettingOffsets positive and negative values
Close-outTerminates all trades together
CollateralMargin covers net exposure

This prevents "cherry-picking" where a defaulting party honors profitable trades but walks away from losing ones.

Common Pitfalls

PitfallDescriptionPrevention
Expired legal opinionsOpinions dated before current tradesRefresh opinions periodically
Threshold miscalculationCross-default triggered unexpectedlyMonitor debt levels vs. thresholds
Missing representationsRequired documents not deliveredTrack delivery requirements
NAV trigger breachFund decline triggers terminationMonitor AUM and NAV

Checklist and Next Steps

ISDA negotiation checklist:

  • Confirm version (1992 or 2002 Master)
  • Select governing law and jurisdiction
  • Set cross-default thresholds appropriately
  • Define Additional Termination Events (if any)
  • Specify termination currency
  • Address tax representations for both parties
  • List required documents for delivery
  • Review netting provisions
  • Attach Credit Support Annex (CSA)

Ongoing compliance checklist:

  • Deliver annual financial statements timely
  • Monitor cross-default trigger levels
  • Update legal opinions as needed
  • Review for regulatory changes
  • Confirm counterparty representations remain accurate

Related articles:

Related Articles