Understanding Real vs Nominal Returns

Your portfolio returned 10% last year and you celebrated a $10,000 gain on your $100,000 balance—but inflation ran 3%, meaning your purchasing power only increased 7% ($7,000 in real terms). The other $3,000 wasn't "real" wealth; it just kept pace with rising prices for groceries, rent, and healthcare. The practical antidote: always evaluate investment performance in real returns (after inflation), not nominal returns (before inflation), because only real returns measure whether you're actually getting richer.

Nominal Returns: The Number Your Broker Shows You

Nominal return is the stated percentage gain or loss on an investment before adjusting for inflation—the number that appears on your brokerage statement. If you buy a stock at $50 and sell at $55, your nominal return is 10% ($5 gain / $50 cost). If your bond fund pays 5% interest this year, that's a 5% nominal return.

The problem: nominal returns ignore what happened to the purchasing power of your dollars during the holding period. If inflation was 2%, your $55 sale proceeds buy only what $53.90 would have bought when you invested (in constant purchasing power). If inflation was 6%, your $55 buys only what $51.70 bought originally—you gained in nominal dollars but lost in real purchasing power.

The point is: nominal returns are the before number, useful for tax reporting and comparing to stated benchmarks, but meaningless for evaluating whether you achieved your wealth goals. You can't eat nominal returns; you spend purchasing power.

Real Returns: Actual Wealth After Inflation

Real return measures the purchasing power gain after subtracting inflation—what you can actually buy with your investment gains. The formula is:

Real Return ≈ Nominal Return - Inflation Rate

For precision (especially with high inflation), use:

Real Return = (1 + Nominal Return) ÷ (1 + Inflation) - 1

Example using the simplified formula:

• Nominal return: 10%
• Inflation: 3%
• Real return: 10% - 3% = 7%

Example using precise formula:

• Real return = 1.10 ÷ 1.03 - 1 = 1.0680 - 1 = 6.80%

The difference is small at low inflation (0.20% in this case) but grows significant at higher inflation. At 10% nominal return and 8% inflation, the simplified formula gives 2% real return while the precise formula gives 1.85%—a meaningful gap over decades.

Why this matters: the real return is what compounds your actual wealth. If you need $2 million in retirement (in today's purchasing power), you must compound real returns, not nominal returns. A 7% real return doubles purchasing power every 10.2 years; a 10% nominal return with 3% inflation does the same.

Historical Real Returns: S&P 500 and Bonds (1926-2025)

The S&P 500 returned 10.38% annualized (nominal) from 1926 to 2025 with dividends reinvested—the number cited in most financial marketing (Source: Official Data). But inflation averaged 3-3.5% annually over the same period, reducing the real return to ~7.20%. That 3.18% difference compounds to massive wealth gaps over 99 years.

Starting with $100 in 1926:

• Nominal growth: $100 → $1,866,611 (using 10.38% nominal return)
• Real growth (purchasing power): $100 → ~$118,000 (using 7.20% real return)

The durable lesson: the $1.87 million is accurate in nominal 2025 dollars, but its purchasing power is equivalent to only $118,000 in 1926 dollars. You're much wealthier, but not 1.87 million times wealthier—you're 1,180 times wealthier in constant dollars.

For bonds, the nominal return was approximately 5-6% annualized (1926-2024), producing a real return of 2-3% after inflation. For cash (3-month Treasury bills), nominal returns of 3-4% left real returns near 0-1%—barely keeping pace with inflation, sometimes losing purchasing power.

The practical point: stocks delivered a 5% real return premium over bonds (7.20% vs 2-3%), and a 6-7% real premium over cash. This is the fundamental trade: accept volatility (stocks) in exchange for dramatically higher real wealth compounding.

Why Savings Accounts Lose Real Value

A savings account paying 0.5% interest with 2.7% current inflation produces a real return of -2.2%—you're losing purchasing power every year. Even a high-yield savings account (HYSA) at 4.5% with 2.7% inflation yields only 1.8% real return, lagging historical stock real returns by 5.4% annually.

Compound that gap over 30 years on $10,000:

HYSA at 4.5% nominal (1.8% real):

• Nominal value: $10,000 × (1.045)^30 = $36,960
• Real value (purchasing power): $10,000 × (1.018)^30 = $17,140

S&P 500 at 10% nominal (7% real):

• Nominal value: $10,000 × (1.10)^30 = $174,494
• Real value (purchasing power): $10,000 × (1.07)^30 = $76,123

The savings account delivered $36,960 in nominal dollars but only $17,140 in purchasing power. The S&P 500 delivered $174,494 nominally and $76,123 in real terms. The real wealth gap is $58,983 (76,123 vs 17,140)—you can buy 4.4x more goods and services with the stock portfolio.

The test: if inflation averages 3% over your lifetime (the historical norm), every dollar in a 0.5% savings account loses half its purchasing power in 23 years without additional contributions. You're not "preserving wealth"—you're watching it erode.

Current Inflation and Real Return Calculations (2025)

As of November 2025, inflation is 2.7% (12-month CPI rate), down from a peak of 9.1% in June 2022 but above the Federal Reserve's 2% target (Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics). The 2024 annual inflation rate was 2.9%. This means:

Current 10-year Treasury at 4.12%:

• Nominal return: 4.12%
• Real return: 4.12% - 2.7% = 1.42%

S&P 500 historical 10.38% nominal:

• Assuming 2.7% inflation continues: 10.38% - 2.7% = 7.68% real return

High-yield savings at 4.5%:

• Real return: 4.5% - 2.7% = 1.8%

Why this matters: when inflation is elevated (above 3%), fixed-income investments lose real purchasing power faster. A bond yielding 4% with 3.5% inflation gives only 0.5% real return—barely worth the duration risk. Stocks historically adapt to inflation through revenue and earnings growth (though with painful volatility during inflation spikes like 2022).

The practical antidote: rebalance toward stocks when real bond yields fall below 2% (bonds become unattractive relative to inflation risk). Rebalance toward bonds when real yields exceed 3% (bonds offer meaningful real income with lower volatility).

Inflation-Protected Securities: Guaranteed Real Returns

TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) and I Bonds (Series I Savings Bonds) explicitly guarantee real returns by adjusting principal or interest for CPI changes.

TIPS mechanics: You buy a 5-year TIPS at 1.40% real yield (current rate as of November 2025). The principal adjusts upward with CPI every six months, and you receive the fixed 1.40% rate on the adjusted principal. If inflation averages 3% over 5 years, your total annualized return is ~4.4% (1.40% real + 3% inflation adjustment).

Example: $10,000 TIPS at 1.40% real yield with 3% annual inflation:

• Year 1: Principal adjusts to $10,300; you earn 1.40% on $10,300 = $144 interest
• Year 2: Principal adjusts to $10,609; you earn 1.40% on $10,609 = $149 interest
• Year 5: Principal is ~$11,593; total return is ~4.4% annualized nominal (1.40% real is guaranteed)

I Bonds mechanics: Composite rate = fixed rate (set at purchase, currently 0.9%) + variable inflation rate (reset every 6 months, currently 3.12%), giving 4.03% total (November 2025 - April 2026). The rate cannot fall below 0% even in deflation (protecting your nominal value).

The point is: TIPS and I Bonds guarantee you won't lose purchasing power (assuming you hold to maturity for TIPS, or at least 5 years for I Bonds to avoid the 3-month interest penalty). Traditional bonds and savings accounts only guarantee nominal values—if inflation spikes, your real wealth evaporates.

Measuring Portfolio Success: Real Return Targets

When setting investment goals, always frame them in real return requirements, not nominal targets. If you need to turn $100,000 into $500,000 in 20 years (in today's purchasing power), you need a 5x real return, which requires a real return of 8.4% annually (using the rule: (1 + r)^20 = 5).

Translating to nominal returns assuming 3% inflation:

• Real return needed: 8.4%
• Nominal return needed: 8.4% + 3% = ~11.4%

That's above the S&P 500's historical 10.38% nominal return, signaling you need (higher equity allocation), (longer time horizon), or (more aggressive investments like small-cap or international stocks).

The durable lesson: if you plan for nominal returns (targeting $500,000 in nominal dollars), inflation will shrink that $500,000 to $276,000 in today's purchasing power (assuming 3% inflation × 20 years). You hit your nominal goal but missed your real goal by 45%.

The practical point: use financial calculators with inflation-adjusted inputs. When calculating retirement needs, input expenses in today's dollars and set return assumptions at real rates (7% for stocks, 2-3% for bonds). Then verify the outputs in purchasing power terms, not nominal terms.

Detection Signals: You're Ignoring Inflation If

You're likely thinking in nominal (not real) terms if:

• You celebrate a 6% portfolio gain in a 4% inflation year (real gain is only 2%)
• You target "10% annual returns" without specifying real or nominal (ambiguity costs you 30% compounding over 30 years)
• You keep emergency fund in 0.5% savings during 3% inflation (losing 2.5% purchasing power annually)
• You compare today's home prices to 1990s prices (without adjusting for 100%+ cumulative inflation since then)
• You assume $1 million in retirement is "set for life" (ignoring that $1M in 2055 buys far less than $1M today)

The test: if you're evaluating investment returns, asset allocation, or savings goals without the word "inflation" appearing, you're using nominal thinking (which systematically overestimates wealth and underestimates required returns).

Practical Example: Retirement Planning in Real Terms

Scenario: You're 35, have $50,000 saved, and need $1.5 million in today's purchasing power at age 65 (30 years). You plan to contribute $12,000/year. What real return do you need?

Step 1: Calculate future value needed in real terms

• Target: $1.5 million (today's purchasing power)
• This is your real wealth goal (inflation-adjusted)

Step 2: Solve for real return Using a financial calculator:

• PV = -$50,000 (starting balance)
• PMT = -$12,000 (annual contribution, in today's dollars)
• FV = $1,500,000
• N = 30
• Solve for I/Y = 6.4% real return required

Step 3: Translate to nominal return Assuming 3% average inflation:

• Nominal return needed: 6.4% + 3% = 9.4%

Step 4: Asset allocation to achieve 9.4% nominal

• S&P 500 historical: 10.38% nominal → allocation could be 80-90% stocks
• Bonds historical: 5-6% nominal → allocation 10-20% bonds for stability

The practical antidote: if you planned in nominal terms (forgetting inflation), you might have targeted $1.5 million in nominal dollars, which at 3% inflation over 30 years is worth only $618,000 in today's purchasing power—59% short of your real goal.

Next Step: Recalculate One Goal in Real Returns

Single action: Pick your largest financial goal (retirement, house down payment, child's college) and recalculate the required return in real terms (after inflation).

How-to:

1. State your goal in today's purchasing power (e.g., "I need $80,000/year in retirement in today's dollars")
2. Calculate how much you need saved: $80,000 / 0.04 (4% withdrawal rate) = $2 million in real terms
3. Use a financial calculator with your current savings and planned contributions to solve for real return (I/Y)
4. Add 3% (expected long-term inflation) to get nominal return required
5. Compare to asset class historical real returns: stocks (7%), bonds (2-3%), cash (0-1%)
6. Adjust asset allocation or contribution amounts to meet required real return

The point is: one planning session in real return terms prevents a decade of false progress toward nominal goals. Start today by adjusting your investment policy statement (IPS) or retirement calculator to show real returns, not nominal.

---

Sources:

• Official Data. "S&P 500 Historical Returns (1926-2025)." https://www.officialdata.org/us/stocks/s-p-500/1926
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Consumer Price Index." https://www.bls.gov/cpi/
• Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Consumer Price Index 2024 in Review." https://www.bls.gov/opub/ted/2025/consumer-price-index-2024-in-review.htm