Global Conflict Scenarios and Energy Markets

Energy markets are the most direct transmission channel for conflict risk to global portfolios. When military tensions escalate in oil-producing regions, crude prices can spike 20-30% within weeks—as occurred in February-March 2022 when Brent crude surged from $97 to $128 following the Russia-Ukraine conflict onset (EIA, 2022). Understanding the conflict-energy price linkage—and which scenarios pose the greatest supply risk—transforms geopolitical headlines into actionable portfolio intelligence.

Conflict Risk Channels to Energy Markets

Conflicts affect energy markets through four primary channels: production disruption, transit disruption, sanctions and trade restrictions, and risk premium adjustment.

The transmission chain:

Conflict event → Supply channel impact → Physical supply/demand change → Price adjustment → Downstream effects (chemicals, transport, manufacturing)

Production and transit disruptions create physical supply gaps—actual barrels removed from the market. Sanctions may or may not reduce physical supply depending on enforcement and workarounds. Risk premium adjustments affect prices even when physical supply remains unchanged.

The durable lesson: not all price moves reflect physical shortages. Distinguishing risk premium spikes from genuine supply disruptions helps calibrate response.

Key Energy Chokepoints

Global oil and gas flows concentrate through a small number of geographic chokepoints. Conflict affecting these locations has outsized market impact.

Critical maritime chokepoints:

Data: EIA (2023)

The Strait of Hormuz represents the highest-impact single point of failure. Approximately 21 million barrels per day of oil transit this 21-mile-wide passage between Iran and Oman. A credible disruption threat can move prices $10-20 per barrel within days.

Pipeline infrastructure:

Major pipelines also represent concentration risk. The Druzhba pipeline system delivers approximately 1 million barrels per day of Russian crude to European refineries. The Nord Stream pipeline system (prior to 2022 damage) delivered over 150 million cubic meters of natural gas daily to Germany.

The point is: a small number of geographic locations account for disproportionate shares of global energy trade. Monitoring conflict risk at these chokepoints provides early warning.

Supply Disruption Scenarios

Different conflict scenarios produce different supply impact magnitudes. Scenario analysis helps calibrate potential price effects.

Scenario 1: Regional conflict without direct chokepoint impact

Example: Conflict in a secondary oil-producing country (e.g., Libya, Nigeria civil unrest)

• Supply at risk: 0.5-1.5 million barrels per day
• Price impact: +$5-15 per barrel (5-15% on $100 base)
• Duration: Weeks to months
• Market response: SPR release consideration, demand destruction at margin

Scenario 2: Major producer sanctions or export halt

Example: Iran 2012-2015 sanctions, Russia 2022 sanctions

• Supply at risk: 1-4 million barrels per day
• Price impact: +$20-50 per barrel (20-50% spike, gradual normalization)
• Duration: Months to years
• Market response: Alternative sourcing, demand reduction, SPR releases

Scenario 3: Chokepoint transit disruption

Example: Strait of Hormuz closure scenario

• Supply at risk: Up to 21 million barrels per day (temporary, until rerouting)
• Price impact: +$30-100 per barrel (initial spike), then stabilization as alternatives establish
• Duration: Days to weeks of maximum disruption
• Market response: Emergency stockpile releases, demand destruction, diplomatic intervention

Scenario 4: Major infrastructure damage

Example: Attack on Saudi processing facility (Abqaiq 2019)

• Supply at risk: 5-6 million barrels per day (temporary)
• Price impact: +$5-15 per barrel (Brent rose 15% on September 16, 2019)
• Duration: Days to weeks until repairs
• Market response: SPR release signaling, assessment of damage severity

Price Reaction Patterns

Energy price reactions to conflict events follow recognizable patterns. Understanding these patterns helps distinguish temporary spikes from sustained moves.

Typical price reaction sequence:

Phase 1: Spike (Day 1-3)

• Prices jump 5-20% on initial headlines
• Futures curve backwardates (near-term prices exceed deferred)
• Volatility indices spike
• This phase is driven by uncertainty and position covering

Phase 2: Assessment (Day 3-14)

• Initial spike partially reverses if physical damage is limited
• Market assesses actual supply impact vs. risk premium
• Alternative supply and rerouting options evaluated
• Prices settle at "post-event baseline" incorporating new information

Phase 3: Normalization or Sustained Elevation (Week 2+)

• If supply impact is temporary: prices return toward pre-event levels
• If supply impact is sustained: prices establish new equilibrium
• Demand response begins at elevated price levels

Historical price reaction examples:

The practical lesson: initial spikes often overstate sustained price impact unless physical supply is genuinely offline. Distinguishing the two is the core analytical challenge.

Hedging and Mitigation Approaches

Investors and businesses can mitigate conflict-driven energy price risk through several mechanisms.

For investors:

Portfolio considerations:

A portfolio with 5% energy equity exposure gains roughly 1% of portfolio value for every 20% rise in oil prices (assuming 1:1 beta to oil, which is approximate). This provides partial natural hedge for energy-sensitive liabilities but limited protection for concentrated energy cost exposure.

For operating businesses:

• Fixed-price supply contracts (lock in cost, give up upside)
• Futures hedging (standardized, mark-to-market)
• Physical inventory buffer (working capital cost)
• Geographic diversification of supply sources

The point is: complete hedging is expensive and often impractical. Most investors accept some conflict-energy exposure while maintaining awareness of the risk.

Natural Gas and Regional Considerations

Natural gas markets are more regionally segmented than oil markets. Conflict impacts vary significantly by geography.

Regional natural gas benchmarks:

The 2022 European natural gas crisis demonstrated regional vulnerability. TTF prices rose 400% from pre-conflict levels as Russian pipeline flows declined. North American prices rose modestly (50%) due to limited pipeline connectivity.

LNG and flexibility:

LNG cargoes provide some flexibility for redirecting supply between regions, but infrastructure constraints (regasification capacity, shipping) limit rapid adjustment. In 2022, European LNG imports increased by approximately 60%, but this required 6-12 months of infrastructure and contract adjustment (IEA, 2023).

The durable lesson: gas market conflict exposure is highly geography-dependent. European portfolios faced dramatically different energy cost impacts than North American portfolios in 2022.

Monitoring Framework

Effective conflict-energy monitoring requires tracking both geopolitical developments and energy market signals.

Geopolitical indicators:

• Military positioning and exercises in energy-relevant regions
• Diplomatic developments (negotiations, threats, alliance statements)
• Sanctions program changes (escalation or de-escalation)
• Infrastructure security incidents (attacks, attempted attacks)

Energy market signals:

Alert thresholds:

• Brent price moves >5% in a day: conflict scenario assessment warranted
• TTF/Henry Hub spread exceeds 5x: regional dislocation, assess European exposure
• Backwardation exceeds $3/barrel (1-month vs. 6-month): near-term supply stress

Detection Signals: You're Exposed If...

• You hold European equities without understanding their energy cost sensitivity
• Your portfolio's energy sector weight doesn't align with your view on geopolitical risk
• You can't name the three most important energy chokepoints and their daily flows
• You don't know whether your holdings have operating exposure in conflict-prone regions
• Your reaction to energy price spikes is always reactive (no pre-planned response)

Energy Conflict Risk Monitoring Checklist

Essential (Start Here)

• Know the major chokepoints and their daily flow volumes (table above)
• Track Brent crude as a baseline geopolitical energy indicator
• Monitor major news sources for conflict developments in energy-producing regions
• Understand your portfolio's energy sector weight and what it implies for conflict sensitivity

High-Impact Refinements

• Watch futures curve shape (backwardation signals near-term supply stress)
• Track European natural gas prices (TTF) if you have European equity exposure
• Monitor IEA and EIA monthly reports for supply/demand balance updates
• Set price alerts for >5% daily moves in crude benchmarks

Advanced (For Active Managers)

• Monitor tanker tracking data for real-time flow changes
• Track refining margin differentials for downstream impact signals
• Model portfolio sensitivity to specific supply disruption scenarios
• Consider options strategies for tail risk hedging

Your Next Step

Identify your portfolio's energy exposure—both direct (energy sector equities, commodity funds) and indirect (airline, chemical, industrial holdings with significant energy input costs). For the three holdings with largest energy sensitivity, model the impact of a 30% oil price spike on their operating margins. Use this analysis to decide whether your current exposure aligns with your conflict risk tolerance.

---

Related: Energy Security and Strategic Reserves | Geopolitical Risks in Energy Markets | Mapping Geopolitical Risk to Asset Classes

---

Sources: EIA (2022, 2023). Short-Term Energy Outlook and World Oil Transit Chokepoints Report. | IEA (2023). Global Gas Security Review. | CME Group (2023). Energy Futures Market Data. | Federal Reserve Board (2023). Commodity Price Indices.