Using Risk-On/Risk-Off Dashboards

A risk-on/risk-off dashboard isn't a market-timing tool. It's a discipline tool—and that's the only honest reason to build one. Most investors don't need help generating views; they need help noticing when the market has already moved into a different regime so they stop trading the last one. Four widely watched indicators—VIX, credit spreads, the dollar, and the Treasury curve—do most of that work. The move: track them on a single page, score them with predefined thresholds, and use the reading to set the aggressiveness of your rebalancing rather than to override your strategic allocation.
What Risk-On and Risk-Off Really Mean
Financial markets constantly shift between two broad behavioral states: risk-on and risk-off. In risk-on environments, investors favor assets with higher expected returns and greater volatility—equities, high-yield bonds, emerging market debt, commodities. In risk-off environments, capital flows toward perceived safe havens: US Treasuries, gold, the dollar, high-quality sovereign debt.
These regime shifts are not binary switches but gradual transitions that can persist for weeks, months, or years. The 2009–2020 period was predominantly risk-on, punctuated by brief risk-off episodes like the 2011 European debt crisis and the 2015–2016 growth scare. The COVID crash of March 2020 was the textbook extreme risk-off event, with the VIX spiking to 82.69 on March 16, 2020—the highest closing level in history. The 2022 stagflation drawdown was a different beast: equities and Treasuries fell together, breaking the classic flight-to-quality reflex and reminding everyone that the dashboard works less well when inflation is the dominant macro force.
The point is: regime identification is descriptive, not predictive. The dashboard tells you what just happened with high reliability, and what's currently happening with reasonable reliability. Anyone selling you regime indicators as a forecast tool is selling fiction.
Key Indicators for Regime Identification
The VIX: Equity Market Fear Gauge
The CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) measures 30-day implied volatility on S&P 500 options. It reflects the market's expectation of near-term price swings and serves as a real-time sentiment indicator.
Key VIX thresholds for regime classification:
| VIX Level | Regime Signal | Historical Context |
|---|---|---|
| Below 12 | Extreme complacency | Often precedes volatility spikes |
| 12-16 | Low volatility, risk-on | Normal bull market conditions |
| 16-20 | Elevated, caution | Transitional period |
| 20-25 | Moderate stress | Correction territory |
| 25-35 | High stress, risk-off | Bear market typical |
| Above 35 | Crisis conditions | Panic selling underway |
During the 2017-2018 period, the VIX averaged just 11.1, signaling extreme risk-on conditions. By contrast, the VIX averaged 25.5 in 2020 and spiked above 80 during the March selloff, clearly marking risk-off territory.
Credit Spreads: The Bond Market's Vote
Credit spreads measure the yield premium investors demand for holding corporate bonds over comparable Treasury securities. Widening spreads indicate growing concern about default risk and economic deterioration.
The two most watched credit spread indicators:
Investment Grade (IG) Spreads: The ICE BofA US Corporate Index option-adjusted spread (OAS) captures investment-grade credit conditions. Normal levels range from 80 to 120 basis points. Spreads above 150 bps signal stress, while levels exceeding 200 bps indicate significant risk-off conditions. During March 2020, IG spreads blew out to 373 bps before Federal Reserve intervention.
High Yield (HY) Spreads: The ICE BofA US High Yield Index OAS tracks junk bond conditions. Normal levels range from 300 to 450 bps. Spreads above 500 bps signal caution, while levels exceeding 700 bps indicate severe stress. HY spreads reached 1,100 bps during the 2008 financial crisis and 1,087 bps in March 2020.
Credit spreads often lead equity market stress by days or weeks, making them valuable early warning indicators.
The US Dollar: Global Risk Barometer
The US dollar exhibits a pronounced tendency to strengthen during risk-off episodes. As the world's reserve currency, the dollar benefits from safe-haven flows when global uncertainty rises. The DXY index, which measures the dollar against a basket of six major currencies (euro, yen, pound, Canadian dollar, Swedish krona, and Swiss franc), serves as the standard benchmark.
Key DXY observations for regime identification:
- Sharp DXY rallies during equity selloffs confirm risk-off sentiment
- DXY weakness during equity advances confirms risk-on conditions
- Divergence between DXY and equity direction may signal regime transition
During the March 2020 crisis, the DXY surged from 95 to 103 in just two weeks as investors scrambled for dollar liquidity. This 8% move was extreme by historical standards and confirmed the severity of the risk-off episode.
Treasury Yields: Flight to Quality
US Treasury yields, particularly on 10-year notes, decline during risk-off episodes as investors bid up prices on safe-haven government debt. Monitoring both yield levels and rate of change provides regime context.
Key Treasury yield signals:
| Signal | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Yields falling, equities falling | Classic risk-off confirmation |
| Yields rising, equities rising | Risk-on with growth optimism |
| Yields falling, equities rising | Mixed signal, possible Fed easing play |
| Yields rising, equities falling | Potentially concerning: inflation or Fed tightening fear |
The 10-year Treasury yield fell from 1.92% at the start of 2020 to a record low of 0.31% in March 2020, confirming extreme risk-off conditions alongside the VIX spike and credit spread widening.
Building Your Risk-On/Risk-Off Dashboard
A practical dashboard aggregates these four primary indicators plus several supporting signals into a unified framework. The goal is to identify regime with reasonable confidence, not to time markets precisely.
Core Dashboard Components
The split below puts more weight on the four classic indicators because they have the longest, cleanest historical record of separating regimes; the secondary set adds context but is noisier. The 60/40 split is illustrative—if you build your own dashboard, an equal-weight version of the primary four is just as defensible. What matters is picking a weighting before you need it, not optimizing it.
Primary indicators (weight: ~60% of signal)
- VIX level and 20-day moving average
- Investment-grade credit spreads (OAS)
- High-yield credit spreads (OAS)
- DXY index level and 50-day moving average
Secondary indicators (weight: ~40% of signal)
- 10-year Treasury yield direction (5-day rate of change)
- S&P 500 relative to 200-day moving average
- Copper-to-gold ratio (growth vs. safety preference)
- Emerging market currency performance (risk-appetite gauge)
Simple Scoring Methodology
Assign each indicator a score from -2 (strongly risk-off) to +2 (strongly risk-on):
VIX Scoring:
- Below 14: +2
- 14-18: +1
- 18-22: 0
- 22-28: -1
- Above 28: -2
IG Credit Spread Scoring:
- Below 90 bps: +2
- 90-120 bps: +1
- 120-150 bps: 0
- 150-200 bps: -1
- Above 200 bps: -2
HY Credit Spread Scoring:
- Below 350 bps: +2
- 350-450 bps: +1
- 450-550 bps: 0
- 550-700 bps: -1
- Above 700 bps: -2
DXY Scoring (relative to 50-day MA):
- More than 2% below: +2
- 1-2% below: +1
- Within 1%: 0
- 1-2% above: -1
- More than 2% above: -2
Sum the primary indicator scores (range: -8 to +8) and divide by 8 to get a normalized regime score from -1 (extreme risk-off) to +1 (extreme risk-on).
Example Dashboard Reading
Consider this snapshot from a hypothetical date:
| Indicator | Level | Score |
|---|---|---|
| VIX | 19.5 | 0 |
| IG Spreads | 135 bps | 0 |
| HY Spreads | 485 bps | 0 |
| DXY vs 50-day MA | +1.3% | -1 |
| Total Score | -1 | |
| Normalized | -0.125 |
This reads as mildly risk-off—a cautious but not panicked market. The practical translation: trim tactical equity overweights by 5–10%, hold the strategic allocation steady, and watch the dollar (the only indicator carrying the negative sign). If DXY keeps rallying and credit spreads start widening with it, you're in a confirmed regime shift. If DXY rolls over, the signal was noise.
Data Sources for Your Dashboard
All dashboard components are available through free or low-cost sources:
- VIX: CBOE website, Yahoo Finance, most brokerage platforms
- Credit spreads: FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data) provides ICE BofA indexes
- DXY: MarketWatch, TradingView, most brokerage platforms
- Treasury yields: Treasury.gov, FRED, any financial news site
Update your dashboard weekly under normal conditions, or daily during periods of elevated volatility (VIX above 20).
Allocation Implications of Regime Shifts
A risk-on/risk-off dashboard is diagnostic, not prescriptive. It helps you understand the current environment, but allocation decisions depend on your investment horizon, risk tolerance, and overall portfolio strategy.
Risk-On Regime Implications
When your dashboard signals risk-on (score above +0.25):
- Full equity allocations are generally appropriate for long-term investors
- Credit exposure (investment grade and high yield) typically performs well
- Emerging markets and small-cap stocks often outperform
- Cash drag becomes more costly as risk assets appreciate
- Treasury overweights may underperform
Risk-Off Regime Implications
When your dashboard signals risk-off (score below -0.25):
- Equity volatility likely to remain elevated
- Credit spreads may widen further before stabilizing
- Treasury and gold allocations provide portfolio ballast
- Cash becomes more valuable as a source of optionality
- Quality and low-volatility factors tend to outperform within equities
Transitional Regime Implications
When your dashboard signals neutral (score between -0.25 and +0.25):
- Regime uncertainty is elevated
- Avoid large tactical shifts in either direction
- Focus on portfolio diversification rather than directional bets
- Monitor secondary indicators for emerging trends
- Review rebalancing triggers and risk limits
Practical Implementation Guidelines
Avoid Overreacting
Regime indicators are noisy in the short term. A single day's VIX spike or credit spread widening does not constitute a regime change. Look for sustained moves across multiple indicators over several days to a week before concluding that the regime has shifted.
Maintain a Long-Term Anchor
Your strategic asset allocation should reflect your investment horizon and risk capacity, not the current regime reading. Tactical adjustments around the strategic allocation should be modest, typically ranging from 5% to 10% shifts in equity exposure rather than wholesale portfolio reconstruction.
Document Your Framework
Write down your scoring methodology, thresholds, and decision rules before you need to use them. Having predefined rules prevents emotional decision-making during market stress. Review and refine your framework annually, but avoid changing rules during periods of elevated volatility.
Combine with Valuation Context
Regime indicators work best when combined with valuation awareness. A risk-off signal when equities are cheap (Shiller CAPE below 15) has different implications than the same signal when equities are expensive (Shiller CAPE above 30). Use regime readings to calibrate the aggressiveness of rebalancing, not to override your valuation framework entirely.
Limitations and Caveats
No indicator framework can predict the future or eliminate investment risk. Risk-on/risk-off dashboards have several important limitations:
Lag: By the time multiple indicators confirm a regime shift, markets may have already moved substantially. The dashboard is better at identifying the current regime than predicting the next one.
False signals: Brief risk-off episodes occur regularly during bull markets. Not every VIX spike above 20 leads to a bear market. The 2011, 2015, and 2018 volatility episodes all resolved without recessions.
Regime persistence uncertainty: Once a regime shift is confirmed, you cannot know how long it will persist. The March 2020 risk-off episode lasted just weeks before reversing, while the 2008-2009 episode lasted over a year.
Changing relationships: The correlations between indicators can shift during unusual market conditions. During the 2022 inflation surge, Treasuries and equities fell together, breaking the traditional risk-off relationship.
Despite these limitations, a systematic approach to regime identification helps investors maintain perspective during volatile periods and avoid the purely emotional decision-making that often leads to poor outcomes.
The Test
Does your dashboard tell you anything you wouldn't already know from reading the front page of the FT? If you've built it well, the answer is "occasionally yes"—it catches transitions a few days before they become consensus, and it forces a rebalancing decision when your gut wants to wait. If the answer is "no," your indicators are either too lagging (long moving averages on everything) or you're updating too infrequently to catch the inflection. Tighten the cadence before you start adding indicators.
Your Next Step
Build the four-indicator primary dashboard in a single spreadsheet this week, with thresholds and scoring rules written down before you compute the first number. Run it for one quarter without changing your portfolio—just observe how the score moves and whether your reactions to market headlines line up with the score. After a quarter of paper-trading the framework, you'll know whether it earns its keep in your process or whether it's friction without payoff. Most investors fall into one of those two camps, and figuring out which one you're in is the entire point of the exercise.
Related Articles

Factor Leadership Across Market Cycles
Explore how value, growth, size, quality, and momentum factors rotate leadership across market cycles and what drives these systematic return patterns.

Building Regime Models for Portfolios
Learn to construct simple regime-based allocation models using trend, volatility, and macro indicators while avoiding common backtesting pitfalls.

Durable Goods Orders and Capex Signals
How durable goods orders data reveals business investment trends, including the importance of core capital goods orders for GDP forecasting.